by Linus Edwards

A long, wavering, high-pitched vocal sound resembling a howl with a trilling quality.

On the internet, we all like to cry out. We all like to express our emotions, complain, emote, digitally ululate all the feelings swirling around in our heads. In the past, we were limited to people we directly interacted with to vent our complaints. Now we can get an instant hit of complaining at any time of day, and have hundreds if not thousands read our complaints. It's the pure, uncut heroin of emotional blood letting.

Look through the average Twitter timeline and the majority of tweets will be complaints. These complaints usually center around whichever community the person complaining belongs to. I happen to frequent the Apple/Tech community and thus I see many, many complaints revolving around tech companies, software bugs, app store ratings, advertisements, and programming languages.

Mostly these complaints will be all about emotion, not reason. That is what many miss when trying to figure out social media - it's about emotion. We like to think we are all very logical and reasoned people, but we're not. We're all very emotional creatures that have huge biases. We'll play fast and loose with logic all day if it promotes our causes, yet become logic professors the second someone criticizes our causes. This is all wrapped up in human nature and very, very hard to transcend.

This all leads to so many opinions and voices on the internet that it creates an immense war of words and ideas. Millions upon millions of voices all crying out in the same room, at the same time, with no filters. Everything taken to highly emotional levels that no logic can cut through. Conflict and hatred and anger form a generally unsettled feeling amongst everyone. We don't usually find peace and harmony on the internet. We don't open Twitter to be one with the universe. We don't reach nirvana through Facebook.

We remain animals, albeit intelligent animals, but still very much animals. With our filters almost completely down through the instant and semi-anonymous nature of the internet, that animal instinct runs rampant. Yet, there is just enough intelligence in us all to combat this nature. We can be better, if we try.

You can fight that instant wave of emotion when you read a tweet you disagree with or see a headline that makes you angry. You don't have to respond, you don't have to snark, you don't have to scream out to the gods. You can move on with your day and try to contribute something more to the internet than righteous indignation and anger. It's by no means easy, but otherwise you remain a caged animal swiping your claws at any shadow you see.

A Watch Too Far

by Linus Edwards

This was the week, the week that is said to have changed everything for Apple, the week we've been waiting for since Steve Jobs passed away three years ago.

The "Apple Watch" was introduced.

Touted as a "new chapter" in Apple's history, it is said to be a revolutionary way to interact with one's digital device. This has been coming for a long time and rumors of an Apple wearable have been around for years. I even wrote about the possibility last year, speculating on my vision of such a device. Now that it's here and we can see Apple's full vision, we can contemplate exactly what Apple has introduced into the world.

A Short Trip Through Computing History

Go back about forty years ago and computers were still rather large machines that resided mostly in universities, large businesses, and government institutions. The thought that a regular person could own a "personal" computer was a foreign concept. However, everything changed in the late 70s when personal computers became a reality, spurred on tremendously by the Apple II, amongst others.

This was the first big leap of a computer from the monolithic corporate installation to a device in one's own home. It didn't immediately take hold but slowly over the years the personal computer became ubiquitous. People had a relationship to their computer, it was a part of their lives. Yet, for many years it remained a box that sat on a desk in their house.

The next big leap occurred with the laptop computer, which allowed people to take their computing experience outside the house. Portability changed things dramatically, because a laptop made the computer more personal, more available, more connected to one's life. But weight, size, and lack of battery life held things back. Laptops were only a step in the evolution of making a computer truly personal.

Then came the iPhone, the biggest step in that evolution so far. Suddenly a computer was in your pocket, available anytime you wanted it. It was always there, always ready to connect you to your digital world. The barriers have been broken down and smart phones have taken over our lives. Everywhere you look people are using them, at all times. They are truly personal computers, much more so than the traditional PC.

Over this time the common trajectory of computers has been from large and disconnected from humans, to small and intimately connected to us. This has tracked closely with size and portability. From the desktop to the laptop to the smart phone.

So, About That Watch

So why am I giving you a history lesson?

Because I think the Apple Watch is the natural progression of this evolution of computers. It may have seemed the smart phone was the last conqueror of our computing lives, but even it has limits. We don't carry it in our hands at all times, and must put it in our pockets or purses on occasion. However, the Apple Watch is always there, sitting on our wrist, allowing us constant connection to our computers. Computers can be in our lives without any interruption, at all times.

But is this a good thing? Should computers become this personal? Should we want this amount of connection with no break?

Those are the questions I've been asking myself a lot in the past couple days. Even before this I've struggled with being addicted to my iPhone, with checking it too often, with ignoring people as I stared into it. It seems to sit near me at all times, ready to give me that sweet hit of a notification that my body craves.

I think many people feel the same way, although many don't think this is a bad thing. It may just be I'm an old man at the ripe age of 32. I remember a time before iPhones, before the internet actually. I remember not having the intimate connection with my computer. I remember living more in the real world, taking more notice of things instead of my phone. But I fully admit I might be idealizing the past and the younger generation has no nostalgia for those times.

But one must ask what's the end game, how connected will we become with our computers? While the Apple Watch is always on your wrist, it still is not as extreme as something like Google Glass, where you literally must stare at your computer at all times. I assume eventually in some far off future we will have direct neural connections with computers, allowing our very thoughts to intermingle to the point the distinction between humans and machines might be impossible to differentiate. That will truly be a personal experience.

Going back to the Apple Watch though, I think it may have crossed a line in my own mind. I don't want my computer to be "that" personal, to the point I can't simply put it in my pocket and be free of distraction. Maybe I'm deluding myself and I'll get used to it, the same way I've gotten used to having an iPhone at all times. I don't know, but I feel there needs to be some disconnection, some way to have a conversation with a friend and not have your wrist tingling every few minutes.

The counter argument to this is that the watch actually increases your connection to other people, because we all connect with each other so much over the internet nowadays. I appreciate this argument, but I'm not sure I'm ready to sacrifice my real world connections to such a degree for my online connections. There still seems something fundamentally different between the two. Texting someone just can't compare to an actual real world conversation. Sharing your heartbeat may be a great gimmick, but still pales in comparison to actually feeling another human being's touch.

There's a clear evolution of computers that are becoming more and more personal and connected to us. However, with that connection to computers, we sacrifice more and more of our human connection. This evolution can't be stopped though, and will continue ever further into the future. The Apple Watch is the next stop on the line, and the one where I may have to get off.

The Daily Zen #17 "How to be Creative in One Simple Step"

by Linus Edwards

I haven't written a Daily Zen since February 28, 2014, and haven't written any post on here since May 13, 2014. I've gotten a few people tweet at me as to what happened and why I stopped posting. I had been pretty consistently posting on VintageZen for about a year, but after that time it started to become a chore. I felt I was running out of ideas and getting tired of the "Apple tech scene." So I put it on hiatus, but kept the possibility I could always come back to it some day, even if that meant continuing to pay Squarespace every month. Anyway, I'm not coming back regularly right now, but still thought I'd throw something out in the wide ocean of the internet and hopefully occupy someone's mind for a few minutes. Let us begin.

Everywhere I see blog posts and books and podcasts about "how to be more creative." This is big business and many people make their living teaching you all the ways you can be more creative and tap that creative potential that's waiting to burst out from inside you. What exactly they mean by creativity is usually very ambiguous and can encompasses all kinds of things, from actually making truly unique works of art, to simply being more productive with your time.

Everything about this is bullshit.

Creativity isn't something that can be taught. It's not the same as teaching someone to be more productive, it’s different. I see creativity as actually thinking differently about the ways things are done, and creating new and unique ways to do those things. This is something creative people do naturally and I don't think you can teach it. Picasso didn't read a blog post on creativity and suddenly realize he should be painting more abstractly. James Joyce didn't take a 10 day seminar on creativity before writing Ulysses. These people simply created things because they were creative. It wasn't something they learned, it was something they did.

Yet people eat up these "how to be creative" articles and books and think they will suddenly be able to see the world differently and be super creative. But instead of making them creative, they simply start obsessing over theories of creativity and completely forget about actually doing creative things. It becomes a masturbatory act instead of something they do outside themselves. They start to actually think that because they read a blog post about creativity, they actually were creative that day. Usually these types of people are some of the least creative people you will meet.

Creativity is simple and being creative can be broken down into a single step:

If you want to be creative, just fucking BE CREATIVE!

Old Painting of the Day: The Starry Night by Vincent Van Gogh. Obviously a masterpiece. I saw it in person at the MOMA in New York City a few years ago. I'd highly recommend you do the same.

If you vehemently disagree with this post, please tweet me about it and start a roaring Twitter debate. Thank you!

Why I Think Apple Bought Beats

by Linus Edwards

So the huge news the last few days in the tech sphere has been the rumored acquisition of Beats Electronics by Apple. After the rumor got out, the speculation has been rampant from all ends of the internet. Everyone seems to have an opinion. It's an interesting issue to examine given Apple's current place in the music industry. Beats has always been seen and now you are doing this. Really, you are fucking doing this all out, like a real tech blogger. The opinion piece on the news of the day that hasn't even been officially announced. Yeah, no, go on, keep it up, lets see how this goes.

There are many questions that have arisen from this rumored acquisition, including whether the Beats brand will remain independent, what executives will move to Apple, and how exactly the two companies will merge? I personally see this acquisitions as symbolizing a new wave of come on, really? Are you a member of Apple's board? Do you have some deep connections to the inner workings of Beats? Who the fuck are you lowly wannabe tech blogger who has some vague notions of what you think Silicon Valley is like, while you've never even been there.

What the fuck, stop interrupting me with your criticisms, this is my blog, not Twitter! I like talking about tech, I enjoy speculating on things, what's wrong with that?

Ok good, I think I've broken you out of your head just a bit now. First, there's nothing wrong with speculating about tech acquisitions, but is this really worth your time? Couldn't you be doing other things, things maybe slightly more worthwhile? Writing about things you actually know about? Being creative in some way?

I just want to write about tech and what everyone I follow in the tech sphere is talking about. That's why I got into this community in the first place! If I didn't want to talk about this stuff, I'd leave and find a new community.

I know, I know. I'm you of course. But why not talk about it in some unique way, or talk about some tech issue that others aren't? Why do you have to regurgitate the same talking points every other blogger is discussing? This story has been told from a thousand different angles, is your blog post really adding anything new? Or you just typing out words and thoughts that no one much cares about or will remember in a week, just on the off chance some bigger fish tech blogger might link to you.

Fuck you and your proselytizing and judgment. It's my blog and I can write about Beats if I damn well want! Ok, lets go... so I think the acquisition is great for Apple for a couple reasons. The first is the cultural philosophies of the two companies match up very well, to the point Beats has been on record that it was tremendously inspired by Apple. Come on now. I also think the streaming music service that Beats has created is a giant missing piece in Apple's music strategy. Really, Apple's music strategy? Apple has been faltering with gaining the mindshare of the music culture and needs to break down those walls to reach the untapped youth market. What are you even talking about here? Have you ever sat down in front of the mirror and contemplated your life to this point and wondered if you really, deep down to your core, care about the business practices of Apple?

Why do I have to care about it deep down to my core? Why can’t I just enjoy writing and discussing this as a hobby, as a way to unwind. Why does everything have to be unique and great, some things are just things that exist in the world. So just leave me alone and troll people on Twitter, ok?

Fine, I'll leave you to write your blog post. I'm only trying to help.

Good, thank you. Anyway, where was I? Oh yeah, so the $3.2 billion asking price represents a insignificant amount from Apple's cash hoard that might not effect its standing in Wall Street and... oh fuck, he's right isn't he...